| # | Issue | Details | Status |
|---|
| 6 | Multiple player records | Duplicate player records have been identified from time-to-time. Each player should have one and only one ACF Id recorded in this database. | Ongoing |
| 5 | Most Improved lists | Small differences in the rating improvement values between this database and those published by the ACF were identified a while back. Such differences can affect the order or inclusion of players in the Most Improved lists. | Under review |
| 2 | Statistics page | The Statistics page states there are over 47,000 registered players of which some 45,000 are classified as being either a new or unrated player (Sep-2022). Does this mean that 95% of registered players are either newly registered or have become inactive and unrated? It might be helpful to clarify these statistics; e.g. report the New and Unrated components separately. New features might be useful too; e.g. a data plot which tracks the popularity of chess in Australia.
| Not started |
| Archive |
| 3 | Duplicate foreign key (name-state) | The process of updating quick ratings in the SACA database can be made difficult when the source for those ratings doesn't include players' ID numbers. Typically, players can be identified using just their name and home state, but there can be ambiguity when either players share the same personal details in published ratings lists or a player moves interstate. | Fixed |
| 4 | Most Improved: 30-game rule | Some players are being included in our Most Improved lists who aren't meeting the 30-game qualification. The ACF states "Only players who have...completed a career total of at least 30 games in the prior ratings list... " ACF | Fixed |
| 1 | Player rankings | The state and national rankings displayed in some player profiles were incorrect. Also, lists of top players were found to include inactive players sometimes. | Fixed |
